Subsystem Targeting Orders should already be in the game effectively. It's a little annoying that we still don't have target priorities for fleet or turret orders and cannot set custom ones. The same can be said about apologise for attack. Saves can really spiral out of control due to a misshit and...

Any system that includes content that cannot be achieved in the full offline singleplayer experience is nothing short of a failure.

I assume the intention is to eventually monetise this.

I'd hope to see the paint system expanded in future with effectively full freedom, even decals that can be added, but I can also accept that will be something for the next game.

Add it to the list Egosoft

The factors of one cluster of Xenon cut-off from the others would be a different set of variables. Xenon would evolve separately, in the end. The cool part is when the jump gates do reconnect, the Xenon would either have to accept one branches superiority or eradicate them in a pretty awesome Xenon ...

Yes, it's a well-known afterthought/bug/exploit which people defend because they're ashamed about being labelled as exploitive, in a singleplayer game lol. You then hear the argument about the game can be played however you want, while completely disregarding the many genuine limitations that exist ...

The reality is some people want to cheat, but have this weird self-pride of not being labelled as a cheater and then try to justify such an obvious exploit as fair, balanced or whatever. Nothing balanced about it lol. Just load yourself up with money at the start of the game, why waste your own time.

boogieman335 wrote: ↑

Fri, 19. Aug 22, 06:45

I have not seen any Str Trek ships but there is a mod for a whole Star Wars universe on the Nexus Mods

I have no idea how I completely disregarded X4 Interworlds when I play it now and then and always peek their discord lol. Some great ships in their, but cockpits can be a bit buggy.

Ships don't blow up when they crash into other ships. No, they just go one inside the other and you're lucky to get untangled... Adding to this the horendous (compared to X3) times of saving (no autosave on stations in X4) and reloading, I'm not sure that I prefer this to just blowing up insmithere...

Ships don't blow up when they crash into other ships.

I would so love to see the USS Voyager.

I don't believe we have any Star Trek ships at all. In fact the only ship I've really seen from outside the X-universe is a the Normandy, I believe.

I don't mind the Phoenix, I miss the older designs for Teladi ships. They looked absolutely ugly, in a glorious zero-waste Teladi way that they were actually beautiful...

"Just don't do it" also means "Fix the game yourself!" Honestly no excuse for bad game design. Taking an asgard and rickrolling a system is tiny in comparison to the issues with the game, Throwing a full fleet at a K only to lose your fleet due to bad Ai is far worse. If they fixed the Ai then yes ...

A single-core running at 12ghz would perform far, far better than a quad-core each running at 3ghz even if the game was multithreaded in its current design as much as possible. You might want to look in how particle simulation on GPU works with modern graphic engines. It comes very close to simulat...

Just delete your post, you're embarrassing yourself with a lack of knowledge. Care to enlighten me so I can delete myself afterwards with it? Just read the thread properly. In a fully and truly simulated universe you multithreading requires one core to catch up with another core. This isn't an issu...

The main problem is that the devs obviously have never heard anything of multithreading. So literally everything runs in the rendering thread, which kills FPS drastically if the game has to simulate the universe. This is a poorly implemented algorithm that cannot be solved with CPU power. Just dele...

The Asgard main battery should be nerfed, but by increasing its time to kill and lowering the heat build-up, so it's more a prolonged concentrated death ray than a really short burst. As for capping, it's ridiculous. The 'play-your-own-way' brigade will suggest don't like it, don't use it, but I lik...

It'd be nice to see a system of getting all these paint mods away from online ventures. Baffling that we have light cheats like 'very strong' boarding or don't want to make save-ending changes out being flexible to all players, but draw the line at paintjobs on ships lol... Most probably there was ...

It'd be nice to see a system of getting all these paint mods away from online ventures. Baffling that we have light cheats like 'very strong' boarding or don't want to make save-ending changes out being flexible to all players, but draw the line at paintjobs on ships lol...

IMO this kind of boarding should not really be possible. To take a ship with no rep loss should require getting it far away from anyone and keeping it disabled and destroying its distress drones so it can't report what happened, and they ought to rework the way rep loss works to be more consistent....

Every player would require redesigning their stations to move to these multiple modules in one module model. It would just simply make more sense to implement this in the next rendition of the series.