Trump

Anything not relating to the X-Universe games (general tech talk, other games...) belongs here. Please read the rules before posting.

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum

Bishop149
Posts: 7232
Joined: Fri, 9. Apr 04, 21:19
x3

Post by Bishop149 » Thu, 21. Apr 16, 16:43

muppetts wrote:In the article, which I presumed you had read, this is something she has had a thing about since the 1990's, nothing new or suspect, she likes chilli and hot sauce.
She has an equally long history (combined with her husband) of actively and cynically courting the black vote* whilst doing nothing of substance to support them . . . . in fact often doing things that seek to damage the ongoing civil right movement, as has been frequently highlighted in this very campaign.

Having said that, to give her her due it does look like the hot sauce thing might just be true. . . . she might actually hold some odd idea that spicy food prolongs your life. Which isn't racist . . . . . . . . just some oh so very very strange pseudoscience bullcrap. . . just what you want in the President right?

*Given the transparently cynical and borderline racist way they've gone about it I'm amazed that this seems to have to worked (at least to a degree). Marginalized people usually see right through the "Look I'm white but is understand you" ploy. Maybe the Clintons have employed it more cleverly than I'm aware.
"Shoot for the Moon. If you miss, you'll end up co-orbiting the Sun alongside Earth, living out your days alone in the void within sight of the lush, welcoming home you left behind." - XKCD

muppetts
Posts: 7180
Joined: Fri, 10. Oct 03, 13:50
x3tc

Post by muppetts » Thu, 21. Apr 16, 17:56

or she just likes hot sauce and chillis, which lets face it is a more likely scenario than a 25 year long campaign to foil black voters into loving here because...she likes hot sauce.

As for pseudoscience I don't think there has ever been a single president without flaws, not sure why H Clinton should be any different? Some believe in a man with a big white beard who floats in the sky, so who are we to judge!
VURT The only Feathers to Fly With......

User avatar
Incubi
Posts: 5044
Joined: Mon, 2. Jan 06, 06:59
xr

Post by Incubi » Thu, 21. Apr 16, 18:16

muppetts wrote:
Bishop149 wrote: This made be cringe SOOO hard, David Brent at his best levels of cringe: http://time.com/4297996/hillary-clinton-hot-sauce/
Whats next? Continue to court the black vote in an unconsciously really racist way by professing a love of fried chicken and watermelon?
In the article, which I presumed you had read, this is something she has had a thing about since the 1990's, nothing new or suspect, she likes chilli and hot sauce.
Considering that they are from Arkansas, I am not surprised. That region of America does like its spicy foods! I may have spent my life in California, but my first 9 years was in Texas, which is where I got my taste for spicy foods. What is and is not spicy in America is relative, the most common hot sauce is so watered down it taste like water. So as a spice lover, the idea of having your favorite hot sauce with you when you travel, is not that far fetched.

Of coarse there is some hot sauce that is murder and I avoid it... Like Death Sauce! http://www.deathsauce.com.au/ That stuff will kill you! I suppose Australia likes their foods hot too?

Mightysword
Posts: 4350
Joined: Wed, 10. Mar 04, 05:11
x3tc

Post by Mightysword » Fri, 22. Apr 16, 05:57

Bishop149 wrote: We all know that Americans bizarrely think that "socialist" is a dirty word and it is therefore flung at almost any politician another wishes to try and discredit. Usually by Republicans at Democrats but quite often internally within each party as well.
Most of the time those of us in the rest of the world merely watch on giggling that American REALLY don't know the meaning of the word,
Or maybe we understand exactly the meaning of the word, and that's why we hate it? How is socialist working out for France in the last decade? Belgium is more or less a ticking bomb. Or you know ... we just have to look south at our Latin American neighbors, can't really blame the US having bad impression of socialism where each and every of Latin American countries that embracing socialism crashed and burnt.

Sure, there are some working example like Finland and Denmark, but this just proves that socialism only work when you only have a small and focus population, but when the population is large and diverge, it's destined to fail. Oh, and I'm someone who born and raise in a socialist country, it's the main reason why I moved to the US :P

User avatar
mrbadger
Posts: 14226
Joined: Fri, 28. Oct 05, 17:27
x3tc

Post by mrbadger » Fri, 22. Apr 16, 07:48

There's no rule that states you have to like socialism, but conversly, there's no reason we should like the right wing way America does things.

Never mind land of the free, it's land of the rich, and those people only fit to make money for the rich.

Our system isn't perfect, but the US political system is, right now, extremely broken. It's a democracy with two parties that is set up in such a way that no even vaguely left wing, or anti corporative interest policies can survive. This is not the sign of a healthy system. Especially when 'socialism' is recast as anything that helps the poor at the expense of the wealthy.

Point a finger at our 'socialism' if you like, but look in the mirror first. The 'electorate' do not control America, that makes it a dictatorship where the person at the top still has to change every few years.
If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared. ... Niccolò Machiavelli

Mopy
Posts: 2435
Joined: Tue, 2. Aug 05, 20:59
x3

Post by Mopy » Fri, 22. Apr 16, 16:11

Incubi wrote:Posting this here rather than start a new thread.

I hope you like Hillary. Her victory in New York means Bernie can't catch up, [..]Hillary currently has 1930 delegates and Bernie has 1189. 2383 is require to win the primaries. There is 4765 total ( which is why 2383 is needed to win ) and there is only 1646 left, Bernie would need to win 1194 of those while Hillary only needs 453. [..]
Not quite. The delegate count after NY is 1428-1151 Hillary-Bernie. With ~1600 delegates left, that leaves some room to close the gap.

You counted the super delegates who haven't voted yet.

I don't blame you though, given that most media outlets seem to be doing the same. It's terribly misleading.

People whose job it is to report on politics should know better. Either they're inept, or intentionally dishonest.
Sig

Rnett
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri, 9. Jul 04, 05:52
x2

Post by Rnett » Fri, 22. Apr 16, 18:37

Either they're inept, or intentionally dishonest.

Both.. [ external image ]

User avatar
fiksal
Posts: 16588
Joined: Tue, 2. May 06, 17:05
x4

Post by fiksal » Fri, 22. Apr 16, 19:26

So let's see,

I was paid unemployment when I was looking for work; my grandma is getting small financial health; I almost entirely paid for college with government grants alone (and scholarships). And that just what directly affected me.

I like American socialism

Mightysword wrote: Or maybe we understand exactly the meaning of the word, and that's why we hate it?
Some do, some dont. I come across people who dont even have my level of understanding, which isnt vast itself.

User avatar
mrbadger
Posts: 14226
Joined: Fri, 28. Oct 05, 17:27
x3tc

Post by mrbadger » Fri, 22. Apr 16, 22:13

This reminds me of a conversation I had some years back with a good friend.

She'd finally, after thirty odd years, found her dad in the US. She's from scotland, he's a Sioux Indian bookshop owner.....

When she visited he, one evening, started complaining about the communist socialism of the National Health Service in the UK and what a terrible thing it is.

She shut him down rather fast by saying 'well if it hadn't been for that evil communist health service, I'd be dead'.

According to her the subject never came up again.

Too many people (not just Americans) don't bother to think beyond the sensationalised news they get fed, or whatever they hear that justifies some opinion they want to hold.

I think that's part of why Trump has got where he has in this election.
If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared. ... Niccolò Machiavelli

User avatar
Incubi
Posts: 5044
Joined: Mon, 2. Jan 06, 06:59
xr

Post by Incubi » Fri, 22. Apr 16, 22:54

Mopy wrote:
Incubi wrote:Posting this here rather than start a new thread.

I hope you like Hillary. Her victory in New York means Bernie can't catch up, [..]Hillary currently has 1930 delegates and Bernie has 1189. 2383 is require to win the primaries. There is 4765 total ( which is why 2383 is needed to win ) and there is only 1646 left, Bernie would need to win 1194 of those while Hillary only needs 453. [..]
Not quite. The delegate count after NY is 1428-1151 Hillary-Bernie. With ~1600 delegates left, that leaves some room to close the gap.

You counted the super delegates who haven't voted yet.

I don't blame you though, given that most media outlets seem to be doing the same. It's terribly misleading.

People whose job it is to report on politics should know better. Either they're inept, or intentionally dishonest.
Not surprised. I live in a Republic pretending to be a Democracy with "free" citizens who think they are above the constitution that made them free. So I am never surprised to find that I was misinformed. Yet I think the outcome will remain the same. But that is pure opinion.

A5PECT
Posts: 6170
Joined: Sun, 3. Sep 06, 02:31
x4

Post by A5PECT » Sat, 23. Apr 16, 01:19

What I'm hoping for: Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, Cruz wins the Republican, Sanders and Trump both run as independents. The great, four-way electoral cluster**** of our time ensues.

Mightysword
Posts: 4350
Joined: Wed, 10. Mar 04, 05:11
x3tc

Post by Mightysword » Sat, 23. Apr 16, 09:41

fiksal wrote:So let's see,
I was paid unemployment when I was looking for work; my grandma is getting small financial health; I almost entirely paid for college with government grants alone (and scholarships). And that just what directly affected me.

I like American socialism
Exactly. When my family first come here, I was suprised at the welfare system in the US, it was much more comprehensive than even in countries where they claim socialism. Living here for over ten years, we still believe American actually are a lot more "socialism" than a lot of other places.

- We got 3 months of welfare when we came here, than my dad started working.
- My mother had a surgery and medicaid help paid the lion share of it.
- After 8 years of working, my father got laid off, and he was given 18 months of unemployment benefit.
- I got my bachelor with government grant and scholarship.
- Even now as I'm working on my 2nd master, I still haven't used up my life time education tax credit yet, so I recover about 2/3 of my cost a year.

But the point is, we were happy with the help we got, but we didn't take it for granted. We strike out and try to achieve things on our own end at the same time being frugal and effective. But, I have seen people who came here were on welfare for a whole year and still whine about something like "America so rich but they didn't do enough for me", welp, I guess those people would have a different opinion about "capitalist" America :wink:

It is with great shame that I must admit I know far too many of my countrymen who came here and abuse American's hosbitality while sitting on the arse whining about they're not being given enough. Sometime I told them to **** right off back to our country if they complain so much. None of them ever did go back, because then no one would give them housing, free food, and FASA back home. Of course this does not exclude native citizen, but then again when people are born into privilege, they sometime are not aware of how good they have it. :roll:


mrbadger wrote: Too many people (not just Americans) don't bother to think beyond the sensationalised news they get fed, or whatever they hear that justifies some opinion they want to hold.


Oh common, the same thing can be said about you really. Something about riding the stereotype on the narrative that is fed for you while knowing nothing about the context. It's like joining a reddit thread without participating in the discussion and just post the most trendy answer. :P

Remember the US is a Federal of 50 states with the size of Europe, if anything, the general "American" are probably much better informed in their definitions comparing to a European citizen from a specific country. After all, despite what you may believe, our country have almost every facet there is in existence. You have the Nany state like California, and you also have state with minimum welfare like Texas. They both have large economy, large population, and they're both American, and among the 50 states you can find everything in between. So really, if you think American don't have a good perspective ... well, you're free to believe whatever you want to believe I guess.


BUT, Society Safety net =/= Socialism. The former is good, the latter is bad. Help and assistance from others are a privilege and a favor, it should not be never something taken for granted as an entitlement. I do believe America has a lot of good will (and this comes from an Asian immigrant), but alas they're no damn socialist (thank God!).

User avatar
mrbadger
Posts: 14226
Joined: Fri, 28. Oct 05, 17:27
x3tc

Post by mrbadger » Sat, 23. Apr 16, 19:55

Hey, what I say sets trends, I don't follow them.

I don't know everything, this I realise. I have a Latin American Doctoral Student who has (at my request) translated some of the worst media rhetoric for me.

But I don't need to be perfectly informed do I. Just watching the way things are unfolding is letting me know enough to be worried about how your broken political system (and it is very broken) might be about to put a racist, mysogynistic, isolationist moron in the big seat.

I don't live in the States, but I live in a country that would be severely effected if he screws things up, so I have a right to an opinion.
If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared. ... Niccolò Machiavelli

Mopy
Posts: 2435
Joined: Tue, 2. Aug 05, 20:59
x3

Post by Mopy » Sun, 24. Apr 16, 17:04

Rnett wrote: Both.. [ external image ]
I'd love to know if non-English media does the same, or whether US media just looks worse because large numbers of people access it regularly.

Does anyone know if the internet arm of Mandarin speaking big media does the same for example?
Incubi wrote:Not surprised. I live in a Republic pretending to be a Democracy with "free" citizens who think they are above the constitution that made them free. So I am never surprised to find that I was misinformed. Yet I think the outcome will remain the same. But that is pure opinion.
You've got some of the most interesting selection processes in the world. So many shenanigans along with the immense complexity of even the primaries makes it incredibly hard to keep track of. Even with access to the 'net, it's hard to get any accurate and unbiased information. It really makes me wonder what politicians across the world got away with pre-internet.

I think you're right about Bernie too, it's looking less and less likely as time goes on. It'd be cool if Cali got the final say this time around though. It seems like things are usually over before they get their turn. Tuesday is a really big day by the looks of things. That's a tonne of delegates.
Sig

Mightysword
Posts: 4350
Joined: Wed, 10. Mar 04, 05:11
x3tc

Post by Mightysword » Tue, 26. Apr 16, 02:34

So ... Kasich and Cruz announced they will join force to stop Trump. So let's me get this one thing straight with no context and string attached: two runners up candidate are colluding to make sure the guy with the most votes can't win.

This is supposed to be a democratic process? :shock:

User avatar
Tracker001
Posts: 5948
Joined: Sat, 14. May 05, 17:24
x3tc

Post by Tracker001 » Tue, 26. Apr 16, 06:49

That's what happens when "X"- National Committee " . Doesn't have full control over a Person . He's the front runner and has enough public support and finances of his own , that he does not need , "in the case" , the RNC promise of funds .

What do I mean about "Control Over" ..... something about pigs and politicians in some other country comes to mind .....

brucewarren
Posts: 9243
Joined: Wed, 26. Mar 08, 14:15
x3tc

Post by brucewarren » Tue, 26. Apr 16, 10:39

I've never understood American politics, neither do I think I ever will.

It's too complicated for simpletons like me. This is one of the reasons why I think PR will never be voted into place in the UK. It's also complicated and people instinctively distrust systems they don't understand.

With reason imo. The more complex a system the easier it is to hide where the bodies are buried and the US system appears insanely complicated. I tried watching one of CGP Grey's videos on the Electoral College once. I thought I vaguely got the idea, but it didn't go into great detail and left out quite a bit of wierd stuff.

As for Mr Trump, I wanted to pick up something mrbadger said.

I think we are worrying for nothing. A strong President might be a threat to the UK, especially when in charge of a strong nation, but with Mr Trump in charge the US will soon be neither. Once he's dragged that mighty nation back into the stone age, we might even see States wishing to Secede and I'm sure London will be waiting with open arms to bring them back into the Imperial fold.

I see great days ahead. :wink: :D

User avatar
Antilogic
Posts: 7526
Joined: Wed, 6. Apr 05, 20:33
x3tc

Post by Antilogic » Tue, 26. Apr 16, 11:10

rofl, man if people truly think PR is complicated then we are really doomed.

brucewarren
Posts: 9243
Joined: Wed, 26. Mar 08, 14:15
x3tc

Post by brucewarren » Tue, 26. Apr 16, 12:20

The year is 2011 a referendum is held on a very simple form of PR for the UK.

The results come in at 2:1 against. The numbers are so clear cut that it's likely the question won't be raised again in a generation.

Still think Joe Public understands or trusts PR?

User avatar
Usenko
Posts: 7856
Joined: Wed, 4. Apr 07, 02:25
x3

Post by Usenko » Tue, 26. Apr 16, 12:51

Proportional Representation can be useful, but it has problems too. It can be hard to get a stable government majority, which is useful at times.

The system we have in Australia - Divisional preferential voting in the Representatives (our equivalent of the Commons) and Proportional Representation in the Senate (Our Lords) has served us well. It has its disadvantages, of course, but it allows for the simplicity of a clear majority in the house which can propose legislation, and the representation of whatever minor parties in the house which can block it.

It's a good balance of decisiveness and caution.
Morkonan wrote:What really happened isn't as exciting. Putin flexed his left thigh during his morning ride on a flying bear, right after beating fifty Judo blackbelts, which he does upon rising every morning. (Not that Putin sleeps, it's just that he doesn't want to make others feel inadequate.)

Return to “Off Topic English”